<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Study:  Socio-Economic Status is Linked to Obesity in Black Women</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kulturekritic.com/2012/06/women/study-socio-economic-status-linked-obesity-black-women/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kulturekritic.com/2012/06/women/study-socio-economic-status-linked-obesity-black-women/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=study-socio-economic-status-linked-obesity-black-women</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 15:18:29 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cort</title>
		<link>http://www.kulturekritic.com/2012/06/women/study-socio-economic-status-linked-obesity-black-women/#comment-8135</link>
		<dc:creator>Cort</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 18:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kulturekritic.com/?p=4928#comment-8135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Bull&quot;, we were raised in the 40s (on a farm in LA.)
Some of us got &#039;whipping&#039; and some did not. Some of us went to college and some didn&#039;t graduate from high school. Looking @ pictures and old yearbooks, not one person was considered &quot;fat&quot;. (185 lbs. max, men and women) In 1965 @ a &#039;reunion&#039; we all notice how &#039;fit&#039; we looked then and 25 years later!.  Why? Life Style!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Bull&#8221;, we were raised in the 40s (on a farm in LA.)<br />
Some of us got &#8216;whipping&#8217; and some did not. Some of us went to college and some didn&#8217;t graduate from high school. Looking @ pictures and old yearbooks, not one person was considered &#8220;fat&#8221;. (185 lbs. max, men and women) In 1965 @ a &#8216;reunion&#8217; we all notice how &#8216;fit&#8217; we looked then and 25 years later!.  Why? Life Style!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
